There’s been a lot of chatter lately on the next possible acquisition deal that Cisco may embark on.
It would seem that Cisco could be looking to buy the Netscaler Application Delivery (read: load balancer) platform from Citrix.
In several articles posted online from Barrons, StreetInsider.com, and NetworkWorld, per analysts from Oppenheimer, Cisco is working out a deal to OEM the Citrix Netscaler ACD platform to replace the end of life Cisco ACE.
Now, OEM deals happen all of the time. But anyone who knows Cisco, knows that an OEM deal usually means they are testing the waters of acquisition. It’s just a matter time.
This all makes sense too because right now Cisco doesn’t have a layer 4- 7 product anymore and they desperately need something.
Network engineers who work on big load balanced web properties, like Amazon, Walmart, Match.com, etc., know there are really only two load balancers that are up to the challenge to handle lots of traffic … Thats Citrix Netscaler and F5 Big-IP.
So for Cisco to make a move toward one of those companies would be a smart move for Cisco.
Smart for Cisco but bad for anyone who loves Netscaler.
Remember that the Cisco ACE load balancer was originally the CSS load balancer that was part of the acquisition of Arrowpoint. Around 2002-2003 Cisco bought Arrowpoint and added the CSS load balancer to their arsenal of networking gear. This time they were replacing the Local Director and Global Director (which both really sucked)
At that time the Arrowpoint load balancer was one the best devices of the time. That is until Cisco bought it and stopped putting the resources into it that’s necessary to stay ahead in this ever evolving game.
And so the CSS and the ACE withered on the vine until it was dead.
Now Cisco is on the move to destroy acquire another great load balancer. Only this time it looks like it’s going to be Netscaler.
Per Ittai Kidron from Oppenheimer – Cisco is “close to signing an OEM agreement with Citrix for its Netscaler ADC” which might replace the “ACE” product line being discontinued by Cisco.
The Netscaler product is “a high-quality solution for enteprise/small and medium businesses,” writes Kidron, and he thinks Cisco can put pressure on F5:
F5′s enterprise/SMB sales could come under pressure and so could Radware’s. Longer term, we believe Cisco could move to acquire NetScaler. We see near-term headwinds for F5/Radware (RDWR).
Personally, as an investor it sounds like a great deal. But I don’t see where the “Pressure” on F5 will come from.
Granted as a user of Netscaler devices, Cisco’s TAC support will add a desperately needed breath of fresh air to the less than stellar support of Citrix for the Netscaler. Also Cisco’s sales force is huge and has a lot of muscle.
But the facts stand that F5 make a serious line of amazing load balancers and application firewalls that can easily keep pace with and arguably outperform comparable devices from Citrix Netscaler.
From the Viprion to the newest line of 4200V Big-IP ADC devices, F5 have some great application delivery appliances and doesn’t have too much to worry about.
What are your thoughts? Do you think Cisco buying Netscaler is good thing or do you think Cisco will do the same thing to Netscaler that they did with the CSS/ACE?
Joe Wilson
Senior Network Engineer, technology enthusiast, guitar and bass player. Joe Wilson is the creator of RouterFreak.com as well as other niche websites that can be found around on the Internets.
RouterFreak is a participant in various affiliate advertising programs and sponsorships designed to earn advertising fees by advertising and referring traffic. These earning are essential to supporting RouterFreak but we only recommend products we have vetted and would use ourselves.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Home » Citrix Netscaler To Be Acquired By Cisco?
Citrix Netscaler To Be Acquired By Cisco?
It would seem that Cisco could be looking to buy the Netscaler Application Delivery (read: load balancer) platform from Citrix.
In several articles posted online from Barrons, StreetInsider.com, and NetworkWorld, per analysts from Oppenheimer, Cisco is working out a deal to OEM the Citrix Netscaler ACD platform to replace the end of life Cisco ACE.
Now, OEM deals happen all of the time. But anyone who knows Cisco, knows that an OEM deal usually means they are testing the waters of acquisition. It’s just a matter time.
This all makes sense too because right now Cisco doesn’t have a layer 4- 7 product anymore and they desperately need something.
Network engineers who work on big load balanced web properties, like Amazon, Walmart, Match.com, etc., know there are really only two load balancers that are up to the challenge to handle lots of traffic … Thats Citrix Netscaler and F5 Big-IP.
So for Cisco to make a move toward one of those companies would be a smart move for Cisco.
Remember that the Cisco ACE load balancer was originally the CSS load balancer that was part of the acquisition of Arrowpoint. Around 2002-2003 Cisco bought Arrowpoint and added the CSS load balancer to their arsenal of networking gear. This time they were replacing the Local Director and Global Director (which both really sucked)
At that time the Arrowpoint load balancer was one the best devices of the time. That is until Cisco bought it and stopped putting the resources into it that’s necessary to stay ahead in this ever evolving game.
And so the CSS and the ACE withered on the vine until it was dead.
Now Cisco is on the move to destroy acquire another great load balancer. Only this time it looks like it’s going to be Netscaler.
Per Ittai Kidron from Oppenheimer – Cisco is “close to signing an OEM agreement with Citrix for its Netscaler ADC” which might replace the “ACE” product line being discontinued by Cisco.
Personally, as an investor it sounds like a great deal. But I don’t see where the “Pressure” on F5 will come from.
Granted as a user of Netscaler devices, Cisco’s TAC support will add a desperately needed breath of fresh air to the less than stellar support of Citrix for the Netscaler. Also Cisco’s sales force is huge and has a lot of muscle.
But the facts stand that F5 make a serious line of amazing load balancers and application firewalls that can easily keep pace with and arguably outperform comparable devices from Citrix Netscaler.
From the Viprion to the newest line of 4200V Big-IP ADC devices, F5 have some great application delivery appliances and doesn’t have too much to worry about.
What are your thoughts? Do you think Cisco buying Netscaler is good thing or do you think Cisco will do the same thing to Netscaler that they did with the CSS/ACE?
Joe Wilson
Share this article.
Recommended
Advertising Disclaimer
RouterFreak is a participant in various affiliate advertising programs and sponsorships designed to earn advertising fees by advertising and referring traffic. These earning are essential to supporting RouterFreak but we only recommend products we have vetted and would use ourselves.
Find out more about supporting RouterFreak.
Popular Articles
How to Become a Network Engineer
Read More »Visio Stencil Files
Read More »Network Engineer Interview Questions
Read More »Passing Cisco Exams with Pass4Sure or TestKing? DON’T!
Read More »More Articles
There can be only one – Root Bridge
Read More »Women Network Engineers: Career, Culture, and Challenges
Read More »Shaw Modem Flashing Orange (Causes & Fixes)
Read More »Best Router For Spectrum (2024) – Spectrum Compatible Routers
Read More »